New Orleans, LA(USA) – A federal appeals court hearing on Thursday raised questions about the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which protects nearly 535,000 undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges showed openness to potentially preserving parts of the program despite a previous ruling aiming to end it.
DACA, initiated by the Obama administration in 2012, allows eligible individuals to obtain work permits and protection from deportation. However, Texas and eight other Republican-led states argue that the program imposes undue financial burdens on state resources related to healthcare and education.
Key Arguments Presented in Court
During the hearing, Judge Jerry Smith questioned the legitimacy of Texas's claims, suggesting that the argument for financial strain due to DACA recipients does not hold water. He remarked, “How could a single judge tell all 22 other states who are so grateful for these people that actually they’ve all got to leave the United States?” This comment highlighted the complexity of imposing a nationwide ban while considering the benefits DACA provides to various states.
In contrast, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton maintained that the program enables noncitizens to remain in the U.S. unlawfully, further complicating immigration policy. The appeal follows U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen's 2021 decision, which deemed DACA illegal but paused its enforcement for current recipients during the appeal process.
Legal Standing & Severability Clause
A significant point of discussion was Texas's legal standing to challenge DACA. The Biden administration argued that the state has not demonstrated direct financial harm caused by the program. Judge Stephen Higginson emphasized that claims of indirect financial strain are insufficient for legal standing, a stance supported by a recent Supreme Court ruling. Meanwhile, Judge Smith seemed skeptical of the Biden administration's arguments, hinting at a potential ruling that could only eliminate work authorization while maintaining protections against deportation for existing DACA enrollees.
Impact on DACA Recipients & Their Families
The implications of this legal battle extend beyond the courtroom. DACA recipients, often referred to as “Dreamers,” have built lives in the U.S., contributing significantly to the economy and community. Many have U.S.-citizen children who rely on their parents ability to work legally.
Supporters of DACA gathered outside the courthouse, advocating for the program’s continuation. MarÃa Rocha-Carrillo, a DACA recipient from New York, stated, “I live here. I work here. I own a home here.” Her sentiments echoed the experiences of many in similar situations, emphasizing the deep roots established by DACA beneficiaries.
Read more:- Mohammed Siraj Takes Charge as DSP of Telengana.
As the 5th Circuit prepares to issue its ruling, the future of DACA remains uncertain. The case could ultimately escalate to the Supreme Court, further shaping the landscape of U.S. immigration policy. With both legal and personal stakes at play, the outcome will significantly impact countless families and communities across the nation.
Stay tuned with "In Bulletin", for more futher detailed updates on this Case & International Breaking News.
